Success Stories

July 11, 2012

Report authors: Travis Quicksall - Hydrology & Hydraulics, Justin Gawlik - Permits & EAP, Zane Peavy - Geotechnical Report, Matthew Hoffer - Dam Design, Gabe Birnbaum - Structures

Supervisor: Professor Manuel Diaz, University of Texas at San Antonio


General

This article presents a recent project performed by undergraduate students at The University of Texas at San Antonio. Their project is the culmination their degrees in a capstone class. The objective of the class was to present an opportunity to apply design skills to execution of an open-ended integrated civil engineering design project, including field and laboratory investigations, numerical and scale modeling, design, and formal oral and written presentation of results. Their project considers safety, reliability, environmental, economic, and other constraints, as well as ethical and social impacts.


Site Conditions

The students chose a rehabilitation and expansion of an existing 6 acre reservoir, dam and site appurtenances. The project site is located in Bell County, Texas just outside the Holland city limits (Figure 1). Existing site features include a reservoir with an approximate 6 acre surface area, and earthen dam and spillway on the north end of the reservoir.

Figure 1 - Aerial Exhibit of Existing Conditions With Proposed Waterline Overlay


Geological Conditions

The site area is known to consist of mainly Alluvium Sandy Clay on top of Uvalde Gravel on top of Weathered Navarro with underlying thick Clay Shale. Figure 2 shows a historical geological map of the area where the dam will be located. The area for the proposed dam is located in a sparsely vegetated area within a gentle valley with gradual to semi steep slopes. The historical data was used in lieu of subsurface investigation to generalize the site into four major strata as seen in Figure 3. From this generalization the students were able find typical values, calculate, and use engineering judgment based on knowledge of the site to produce in-situ soil conditions. Tests that were simulated to arrive at final soil conditions are as follows:

Figure 2 - Map of Historical Geological Data

 
Stratum Description
I Sandy Lean Clay (Alluvium)
II Gravel (Uvalde Gravel)
III Fat Clay ( Weathered Navarro)
IV Clay Shale

Figure 3 - Stratum Descriptions

In addition several publications were used in order to ensure realistic values were achieved.


Hydrologic Conditions

The study involved a watershed analysis to determine the maximum expected water levels of the reservoir. The maximum water surface elevation was determined to be:

  1. 100 year Storm = 495.6', and
  2. Design 50% PMF = 496.75'.

The proposed dam would have a watershed of approximately 390 acres. A peak discharge of 1035 cubic feet per-second was used for design. Hydrologic modeling was done with HEC-HMS, while hydraulics calculations were completed with HEC-RAS, Hydraflow Express, and various hand calculations.


Design

The initial student design for the dam involved a 20ft top for a roadway. 3:1 side slopes were designed with a core minimum width of 10ft for compaction equipment. Iterative trials were then used to determine the final design. Original design was done with AutoCAD Civil 3D 2011. The student created profiles at 50 ft intervals from the centerline for analysis. A spillway analysis was performed in order to determine the potential draw-down rates for the reservoir. The AutoCAD drawing for the section Station 3+00 may be seen in Figure 4. The geometry of multiple cross-sections was subsequently imported into the SVSLOPE / SVFLUX software for analysis through the DXF import feature. This feature allowed the students to easily go from their AutoCAD Civil3D model outputs to the Soil Vision software.

Figure 4 - Dam Cross Section

All earth filled dams must be safe and stable during the phases of construction and during the operation of the reservoir. To accomplish this, certain criteria must be met, they are as follows.

  1. The embankment must be safe against over topping during the occurrence of an inflow at design flood level, this is accomplished by providing sufficient spillway and outflow structures that could handle this capacity.
  2. The slopes of the embankment must maintain stability during construction and under all reservoir operations, including rapid drawdown of the reservoir.
  3. The embankment must be designed so as to not impose an excessive stress upon the foundation.
  4. Seepage flow through the embankment, foundation, and abutments must be controlled so that no internal erosion takes place, and there is no sloughing in the area where the seepage emerges. The amount of seepage must be kept to a low enough level to ensure that it does not interfere with regular planned functions
  5. The embankment must be safe against over topping by wave action.
  6. The upstream slope must be designed to resist erosion against wave action, and the downstream slope should be able to resist erosion due to rain and wind.
  7. If the dam is located in an area subject to regular earthquakes, the design must be such that it can withstand the strongest reasonable earthquake that is expected in the region.

Calculations and models were ran to ensure against these conditions, except for (7) because the dam is not located in a seismically active region. The following conditions were analyzed with the Soil Vision numerical modeling program suite. Sections at 50 ft offsets from center were analyzed for the following:

  • Analyzed Conditions
    • Pre-fill
    • Post-fill (full pond)
    • Low pond
    • Rapid drawdown

The SVSLOPE® and SVFLUX™ software packages created and marketed by SoilVision Systems Ltd. were utilized for the study. The answers from the software were subsequently checked using the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) engineering methods.

The creation of the seepage numerical model required the setup of initial conditions and boundary conditions as seen in Figure 5. Flux sections were inserted in the model to track flows through various parts of the model.

Figure 5 - Boundary Conditions


SEEPAGE ANALYSIS

Subsequent seepage analysis of multiple cross-sections was carried out in a steady-state and transient-state fashion in order to determine pore-water pressure distributions, flows through the drains, and phreatic conditions at various points in time. An example of the results of the seepage analysis may be seen in Figure 6. Of particular note is the influence of the drain on the flow regime. The filter layer was sized per USACE manuals. The results of the 300 ft offset may be seen in Figure 7.

Figure 6 - Seepage Analysis at 300 ft Offset

 

Figure 7 - Seepage Results at 300 ft Offset


SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS

The slope stability analysis on both the upstream and downstream sides of the earth dam for multiple cross-sections was carried out. Pore-water pressures were input from the related SVFLUX seepage models previously created. By using the Soil Vision software suite results from the SVFLUX model could be accessed in SVSLOPE. In order to determine the most critical slip surface location a number of different slip surface shapes (circular, non-circular, trapezoidal) were tested alongside multiple searching methods.

The rapid drawdown of the reservoir over a period of 5 days was analyzed at multiple times as shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8 - Rapid Drawdown Phreatic Conditions Over 5 days

The subsequent critical slip surface as determined at 0, 3, and 6 days may be seen in the following figures.

Figure 9 - Effective stress analysis at time=0 days

 

Figure 10 - Effective stress analysis at time=3 days

 

Figure 11 - Effective stress analysis at time=6 days

The SVOFFICE (SVSLOPE & SVFLUX) software utilized for the study performed well and the students had this to comment:

The coupled SVSLOPE and SVFLUX software packages provided an easy methodology of coupling a transient seepage analysis with the slope stability analysis. The software was ideally suited for ourproject with a large number regions due to it's easy geometry CAD interface and its automatic mesh generation. The user interface allowed plots of the results to be output quickly and allowed for quick compilation of a design report for the completion of our project.

Matthew Hoffer, E.I.T. ,
Engineering Student
University of Texas at San Antonio

Please contact us if you are interested in similar studies utilizing the SVSLOPE® & SVFLUX™ software packages for your particular study


Testimonials

  • "I would like to thank you for all the support and the interest that I got from your team regarding this matter. I was able to successfully finish my project with the help of your technical support and managed to graduate achieving a high grade on the project I did. The software is extremely helpful and wasn't complicated and I look forward to future for more work and experience with your software. Thank you for your help and support."
  • "I have been using SoilVision's SVOFFICE™ software for research and training purposes for a number of years now. Myself and my colleagues have developed a number of training modules in this software, and have been using these to teach limit equilibrium and flow modeling to undergraduate students in the civil, environmental and mining engineering streams.

    In my opinion, this software is easy to learn and fun to use. The built-in tutorials are sufficient to get one started. With these tutorials, my students were generally able to complete their analyses with minimal involvement on my side.

    Based on my own experience, it takes around a month of full-time use to become reasonably competent with the software (provided that one understands the theoretical underpinnings of this type of analysis) - a short learning curve, compared to other products of similar complexity. The interface is intuitive enough for me to figure out things on my own, and I rarely had the need to ask for help.

    I don't generally like praising anything excessively, and I don't post particularly glowing reviews for anything. Having said that, I must mention the SoilVision support. At some point during my research, I was conducting a number of replication studies for my thesis. In that period, I must have emailed SoilVision's support anywhere from 2 to 5 times a day, with fairly complex (and sometimes very dumb) questions. I always got a response by the end of the day, and a resolution within a couple days at most. In a number of urgent cases (such as during a tutorial session with a classroom of students) I called them directly on the phone and, with senior product engineers involved, had the issue addressed in minutes."
  • "We have allowed our students the choice of using multiple Geotechnical software suites in our Dam Design and other Geotechnical courses. Our students consistently gravitate towards SoilVision software as being the most modern and user-friendly."

  • "I've been a geotechnical engineer for more than 25 years and SoilVision has the best tech support I have ever worked with. I truly appreciate their patience and help over the past year."

  • "Peter Brett Associates have been looking to update our existing slope stability software over the last year. After extensive research and trials, SVSLOPE® developed by SoilVision Systems Ltd. was found to meet all our existing and future design requirements. Its ease of use for modeling simple as well as complex geological and geometrical problems was a critical factor in our assessment as well as the incorporation of design to the Eurocodes. Their customer support has been faultless and their willingness to develop the software to meet our own specific design requirements is a most gratifying added bonus."

    "We love the fact that SVSLOPE® is part of an integrated suite of software and that, if required, 3D analysis can be undertaken. We would recommend this product to other geotechnical consulting firms."

  • "We have been using SVSLOPE® and SVFLUX™ for the past year and have found them to be efficient and productive engineering tools which have allowed us to offer our services in an efficient manner. The capability of automated increased discretization of the mesh is an absolute benefit to our modeling, reducing time and effort. We have found the software quick and easy for our engineers to train and utilize. I would recommend this product to other geotechnical consulting firms."

  • "The software is well documented and comes with number of useful example models. We were able to quickly begin creating models after a short review of the user interface and going through the available on-line webinars. The software offers solid benefits of less conservatism and the ability to model real geometry."

  • "This new software for stability analysis includes a number of state-of-the-art options for probabilistic slope stability analysis. This feature, combined with comprehensive deterministic analyses, will provide new opportunities to build confidence in the results of a site-specific analysis.”

  • "I'm excited to see the release of this new and innovative product. I look forward to and encourage the application of this software on additional geotechnical projects.”

  • "In consulting engineering practice, I am increasingly made aware of the important and beneficial role that modeling the unsaturated soil zone can play in providing the client with the best possible engineered solution. The SoilVision software has made it possible to readily estimate and incorporate unsaturated soil properties into the modeling of saturated / unsaturated soil systems.”

  • "The use of SVSLOPE® software as part of a research project on clay slopes under seismic conditions with the Université de Sherbrooke has been incredibly easy and effective. The continuation of this research with SoilVision is promising, with technical support, which was present at the right time, as well as a passionate geotechnical team supporting the project.”

Our industry defining software will change the game for your firm